Cases 1 - 10 of 26
Hill v. Rudd, et al
as 2:2023cv02030
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lamonte Hill, Jr.
Defendant:
F/N/U Rudd, F/N/U Porter and F/N/U Buford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Ross et al
as 2:2023cv02012
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lamonte Hill, Jr.
Defendant:
F/N/U Ross, F/N/U Steward, F/N/U Cole and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Porter et al
as 2:2022cv02797
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lamonte Hill, Jr.
Defendant:
Cameron Porter, Captain Green, Shelby County Criminal Justice Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Shelby County Correctional Center et al
as 2:2022cv02351
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lamonte Hill, Jr.
Defendant:
Shelby County Correctional Center, Kirk Fields, Correctional Deputy Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Galipeau et al
as 3:2021cv00603
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lee Hill
Defendant:
Galipeau, Aramark Inc and IDOC Grievance Process Commissioner
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Cain
as 2:2021cv00154
Petitioner:
Kevin James Hill
Respondent:
Brad Cain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hill v. Shelby County Correctional Center et al
as 2:2020cv02513
Defendant:
Sgt. Harris, Ofc. Watlans, Ofc. Smith and others
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lamonte Hill, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Gladieux
as 1:2018cv00331
Defendant:
David Gladieux
Plaintiff:
Kevin Lee Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. King County Jail et al
as 2:2017cv00042
Plaintiff:
Kevin James Hill
Defendant:
King County Jail and King County Department of Public Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Gomez et al
as 1:2016cv11375
Plaintiff:
Kevin Rhea Hill
Defendant:
R. Gomez, T.J. Sherman and M.J. O'Connell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
