Cases 1 - 10 of 125
Albert Anderson v. Winston Salem Police Department
as 23-6609
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALBERT ANDERSON
Defendant / Appellee:
WINSTON-SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT, Sued in official capacity, BOBBY KIMBROUGH, Chief of sheriff sued in individual and official capacity, CATRINA THOMPSON, Chief of police sued in individual and official capacity and others
Rivera v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 1:2021cv23089
Plaintiff:
Felix L. Rivera
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rivera v. Corusso et al
as 3:2021cv00421
Defendant:
Jane Does, Michael Graham, John Does and others
Plaintiff:
Jose L. Rivera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv18938
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv18938
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Rivera v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2019cv02374
Petitioner:
Etberto L. Rivera
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pacheco v. Gustafson et al
as 1:2018cv00013
Plaintiff:
Samuel David Pacheco
Defendant:
S. Gustafson, C Brown, FNU Sonier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pacheco v. Gustafson et al
as 1:2018cv00001
Plaintiff:
Samuel David Pacheco
Defendant:
S. Gustafson, C. Brown, FNU Sonier and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Campbell v. Williams et al
as 2:2017cv03024
Plaintiff:
Justin Douglas Campbell
Defendant:
L Rivera, S Vanzant and Brian S Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RIVERA v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv07776
Plaintiff:
JOSE L. RIVERA
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
