Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Williams v. Stuart et al
as 6:2022cv06336
Plaintiff:
Marquis Williams
Defendant:
C.O. J. Stuart, C.O. J. Brayette, C.O. J. Gillespie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Heap et al
as 4:2019cv00061
Defendant:
Judge Michael Karpf, Governor Brian Kemp, Attorney Michael Schiavone and others
Plaintiff:
Jabbar Muhammad Ali Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Rodriguez v. ATF UC 3749 et al
as 3:2018cv00899
Undetermined:
WABASH VALLEY E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Defendant:
Nick McClaughen, Det Stutsman, DEA 6 and others
Plaintiff:
Enedeo Rodriguez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Heather et al v. Adams County Jail et al
as 3:2018cv03156
Defendant:
Adams County Jail, Brian Vonderhaar and Chad Downs
Plaintiff:
Jason Snider, Skyler Lerch, Edward P Norris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lorick et al v. A'Viands LLC
as 2:2017cv02585
Plaintiff:
Brian Lorick , Carlus Anderson , Heirbrane Foster and others
Defendant:
A'Viands LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Lerch
as 4:2015cv00187
Plaintiff:
Jabbar M.A. Williams
Defendant:
Courtney Lerch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Boteilho v. Christine Gregoire, et al
as 12-15090
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY BOTEILHO
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTINE O. GREGOIRE, HAROLD CLARKE, ELDON VAIL and others
Anthony Boteilho v. Christine Gregoire, et al
as 11-17300
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY BOTEILHO
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTINE O. GREGOIRE, HAROLD CLARKE, ELDON VAIL and others
Boteilho v. Gregoire et al
as 2:2010cv01881
Plaintiff:
Anthony Boteilho
Defendant:
Christine Gregoire , Harold Clarke , Eldon Vail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Anthony Boteilho v. Christine Gregoire, et al
as 10-35610
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY BOTEILHO
Defendant - Appellee:
CHRISTINE O. GREGOIRE, HAROLD CLARKE, ELDON VAIL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
