Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Rickey Benson v. Sheryl Lipman
as 24-5381
Plaintiff: RICKEY BENSON
Defendant: SHERYL H. LIPMAN, Chief U.S. District Court Judge
Benson v. Lipman
as 2:2024cv02021
Plaintiff: Rickey Benson
Defendant: Sheryl H. Lipman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Matthew Faison v. Branstad, et al
as 22-56056
Plaintiff / Appellant: MATTHEW L. FAISON
Defendant / Appellee: BRANSTAD, A & T Brokerage Dealer, ANDREW LIPMAN, Cell Phone Brokerage Manager, BRIAN THOMPSON, Motion Picture Manager and others
Faison v. Branstad et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv01063
Plaintiff: Matthew Levi Faison, Jr.
Defendant: Branstad, Andrew Lipman, Brian Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Arrington v. Lotempio et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2022cv06141
Plaintiff: Roderick C. Arrington
Defendant: Andrew C. Lotempio, Bethany J. Lipman, Jeremiah Lenihan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Buchanan v. Barnes et al
as 4:2020cv00241
Defendant: Sargeant Oldnes, Detention Officer Laston, Detention Officer Crawford and others
Plaintiff: John Anthony Buchanan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lipman v. United States of America
as 5:2018hc02007
Petitioner: Scott Lipman
Respondent: United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Braden v. Todd, et al
as 2:2017cv02619
Plaintiff: Derrick Braden
Defendant: James D. Todd, Sheryl H. Lipman, Diane K. Vescovo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jiggetts v. District Court Patapsco et al
as 1:2017cv01691
Plaintiff: Alexander Jiggetts
Defendant: District Court Patapsco and George Lipman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jiggetts v. Lipman
as 1:2016cv02684
Plaintiff: Alexander Jiggetts
Defendant: George Lipman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?