Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Fields v. Director Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2021cv00464
Plaintiff:
Sherman Lamont Fields
Defendant:
Director Federal Bureau of Prisons, Director Health Services Division BOP, Warden USP Beaumont and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
FIELDS v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2020cv02699
Defendant:
REGIONAL DIRECTOR, T. WATSON, JOHN DOES and others
Plaintiff:
SHERMAN LAMONT FIELDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fields v. U.S.A.
as 6:2020cv00527
Defendant:
U.S.A.
Plaintiff:
Sherman Lamont Fields
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Fields v. Rocky Mountain Offender Management Systems, L.L.C., et al
as 1:2019cv02907
Defendant:
Gregory Chavez and Rocky Mountain Offender Management Systems, L.L.C.,
Plaintiff:
Troy Lamonte Fields
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FIELDS v. LYNCH
as 2:2016cv00418
Petitioner:
SHERMAN LAMONT FIELDS
Respondent:
LORETTA LYNCH and WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Fields v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 6:2016cv00132
Petitioner:
Sherman Lamont Fields
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Fields v. USA
as 1:2016cv00066
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Terrance Lamont Fields
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Sherman Fields v. USA, et al
as 16-5041
Petitioner - Appellant:
Sherman Lamont Fields
Respondent - Appellee:
United States of America and Loretta E. Lynch, Attorney General
FIELDS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2016cv00035
Petitioner:
SHERMAN LAMONT FIELDS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and LORETTA E. LYNCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
FIELDS v. USP TERRE HAUTE
as 2:2014cv00315
Petitioner:
SHERMAN LAMONT FIELDS
Respondent:
WARDEN USP TERRE HAUTE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
