Cases 1 - 10 of 105
LAMPE v. ALLEN et al
as 1:2024cv00908
Plaintiff:
DEVAN LAMPE
Defendant:
TRENT ALLEN and CHRISTINA REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eric Poole v. R. Roderick
as 24-6327
Plaintiff:
ERIC VON POOLE
Defendant:
R. RODERICK, CMM, PAUL WHEELER, CMM, NBCI (individual/official capacity), WCI'S ARP COORDINATOR, day of (individual/official capacity) and others
Bogues v. Nines et al
as 1:2023cv01334
Plaintiff:
Ericky Bogues
Defendant:
Warden Jeffrey Nines, K. Lamp and Food Manager Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Howard v. Cole et al
as 2:2023cv00673
Plaintiff:
Reginald C. Howard
Defendant:
D. Cole, T. Bradshaw, R. Vasquez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ORTIZ v. SCOTT et al
as 2:2023cv00274
Plaintiff:
NELSON ORTIZ
Defendant:
B. SCOTT, GHEYA CALHOUN-BUTLER, NURSE GODWIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poole v. Roderick et al
as 1:2022cv02233
Plaintiff:
Eric Poole and Eric Von Poole
Defendant:
R. Roderick, Paul Wheeler, WCI's ARP Coordinator and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Lampe v. Ingrim
as 3:2022cv00626
Plaintiff:
Devan CR Lampe and Devan Lampe
Defendant:
M Ingrim
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lampe v. Warden
as 3:2022cv00451
Petitioner:
Devan CR Lampe and Devan Lampe
Respondent:
Warden
Not Classified By Court:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Myers v. Hogan et al
as 1:2022cv01229
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Myers
Defendant:
Larry Hogan, Jeff Nines, Kevin Lamp and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Lampe v. Hyatte et al
as 3:2022cv00410
Plaintiff:
Devan CR Lampe and Devan Lampe
Defendant:
William R Hyatte, Jaqueline Scaife and Robert Bennett
Not Classified By Court:
MIAMI E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
