Cases 1 - 10 of 252
Coleman-Bey v. Hendrickson et al
as 6:2024cv03128
Plaintiff:
Larry Lee Coleman-Bey
Defendant:
Michael D Hendrickson, Michael L. Parson, Jeffrey Bates and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2023cv02872
Petitioner:
Larry Lee Davis
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Larry Robinson, Jr. v. Burnham, et al
as 23-1764
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LARRY LEE RAY ROBINSON, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
CORRECTIONS OFFICER BURNHAM, in their individual capacity and NURSE LORI BLUE, in their individual capacity
(PC) Jacks v. Mitchell et al
as 2:2023cv01338
Plaintiff:
Larry Lee Jacks
Defendant:
Mitchell and Lara
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman-Bey v. Hendrickson et al
as 6:2023cv03164
Plaintiff:
Larry Lee Coleman-Bey
Defendant:
Michael D Hendrickson, Andrew Bailey, Andrew J Crane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. E.M.C.F. Medical Dept. et al
as 3:2023cv00260
Plaintiff:
Larry Lee
Defendant:
E.M.C.F. Medical Dept., Nurse Unknown PLN. Wright, Nurse Unknown Brookshire and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pinkston v. Lee
as 23-60179
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Chaz Pinkston
Defendant / Appellee:
Larry Lee, George Castro, Gabriel Walker and others
Coleman-Bey v. McGraugh et al
as 4:2023cv00298
Plaintiff:
Larry Lee Coleman-Bey
Defendant:
Christopher Edward McGraugh and Cristian M. Stevens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Kozinski
as 5:2022cv06135
Plaintiff:
Larry Lee Smith
Defendant:
Mike Kozinsri and Mike Kozinski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Dr. Kozminski
as 5:2022cv06068
Plaintiff:
Larry Lee Smith
Defendant:
Mike Kozminski
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
