Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Perry v. USA
as 2:2020cv00524
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Raymond Lewis Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv00687
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Nathaniel Teamer v. Scott Lewi
as 17-7259
Petitioner - Appellant:
NATHANIEL TEAMER
Respondent - Appellee:
SCOTT LEWIS, Perry Correctional Institution
Respondent:
BRYAN STIRLING, Commissioner South Carolina Department of Corrections
Nathaniel Teamer v. Scott Lewis
as 17-7209
Petitioner - Appellant:
NATHANIEL TEAMER
Respondent - Appellee:
SCOTT LEWIS, Perry Correctional Institution
Respondent:
BRYAN STIRLING, Commissioner South Carolina Department of Corrections
Tyrone Perry v. Correct Health Medical Service, et al
as 17-30446
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TYRONE LEWIS PERRY
Defendant - Appellee:
CORRECT HEALTH MEDICAL SERVICES and JEFFERSON PARISH SHERIFF'S OFFICE
Perry v. Correct Health Medical Services et al
as 2:2017cv00556
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Lewis Perry
Defendant:
Correct Health Medical Services and Jefferson Parish Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v. Paz et al
as 2:2016cv17653
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Lewis Perry
Defendant:
Vicente Paz, Brad Cheramie, Jason Dufrene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perry v. USA
as 2:2016cv00302
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Raymond Lewis Perry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
US v. Raymond Perry
as 14-6207
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RAYMOND LEWIS PERRY
Albert Lewis Perry, Jr. v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 13-7396
Petitioner - Appellant:
ALBERT LEWIS PERRY, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, MARIE VARGO, Warden of Sussex II State Prison, Waverly, Virginia and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
