Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Robert Bostic v. Sumter County Police Department
as 24-6351
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LAWRENCE BOSTIC
Defendant:
CITY OF SUMTER COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, JESSICA HATCHLEY, HEATH L. GARDNER and others
Bonilla v. Meza et al
as 3:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
Amalia L Meza, Charles G Rogers, Esteban Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Bostic v. City of Sumter County Police Department et al
as 3:2024cv00026
Plaintiff:
Robert Lawrence Bostic, Robert L. Bostic and Robert Bostic
Defendant:
City of Sumter County Police Department, Jessica Hatchley, Hsath L. Gardner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Coomer v. Roth
as 23-10845
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Tracey Harris Coomer
Defendant / Appellee:
Mark Roth, Warden Arnold, Daisha B. Simmons and others
Newsome v. Gill et al
as 3:2018cv01938
Defendant:
Cynthia Aaron, Judith Haller, Judge Judith McConnell and others
Plaintiff:
Mario A. Newsome
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Coomer v. Roth et al
as 2:2018cv00121
Petitioner:
Tracey Harris Coomer
Respondent:
Mark Roth, Warden Arnold, Daisha B Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Coomer v. Roth et al
as 1:2018cv00298
Plaintiff:
Tracey Harris Coomer
Defendant:
Mark Roth, Warden Arnold, Daisha B Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lashawn Gill v. Harold W. Clarke
as 17-7215
Petitioner - Appellant:
LASHAWN M. GILL
Respondent - Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections
Paul Roberts v. California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation et al
as 5:2016cv01929
Defendant:
D. Borders, D. Borders, California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and others
Plaintiff:
Paul Roberts
Gill v. MacDonald
as 3:2016cv01177
Petitioner:
Steven M. Gill
Respondent:
MacDonald
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
