Cases 1 - 10 of 192
Jones v. Locklear
as 5:2024hc02110
Petitioner:
Michael Contrez Jones
Respondent:
Warden Mary Locklear
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. MDOC et al
as 2:2024cv10502
Plaintiff:
Michael Magik Jones
Defendant:
MDOC, People of the State of Michigan and Ingham County Jail
Jones v. East Baton Rouge et al
as 3:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
East Baton Rouge, West Baton Rouge and Corey Felder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. East Baton Rouge et al
as 6:2023cv01537
Plaintiff:
Michael D Jones, Jr
Defendant:
East Baton Rouge, West Baton Rouge and Corey Felder
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Retic v. Captain John Hutton et al
as 5:2023cv01396
Plaintiff:
Anthony Retic
Defendant:
Captain John Hutton and Lieutenant Michael J. Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dailey v. Fenstmacher et al
as 1:2023cv00565
Plaintiff:
Michael Dailey
Defendant:
Kerry Fenstmacher, Rachel Nagy, A New Awakening and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Dzurenda et al
as 2:2023cv00793
Plaintiff:
Michael Anthony Jones
Defendant:
James Dzurenda, Gabriella Najera, William Hutchings and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. West Baton Rouge
as 3:2023cv00342
Plaintiff:
Michael D. Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
West Baton Rouge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Cannataro et al
as 2:2023cv02027
Plaintiff:
Michael A Jones, II
Defendant:
Nicholas Cannataro, Shannon Haggard, Jeffery Long and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones, Michael v. Johnson et al
as 3:2022cv00587
Plaintiff:
Michael Jermaine Jones
Defendant:
Captain Johnson, Susan B., Lydia Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
