Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Bradley v. Grady et al
as 8:2023cv02404
Plaintiff:
Phillip Michael Bradley
Defendant:
Sheriff Judd Grady, Polk County and The State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Polk)
as 8:2023cv01553
Petitioner:
Phillip Michael Bradley
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) Bradley v. Wellpath Health
as 2:2021cv01409
Plaintiff:
Joseph M. Bradley and Joseph Michael Bradley
Defendant:
Wellpath Health
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GOMEZ et al v. COMMONWEALTH OF PA et al
as 5:2019cv04413
Defendant:
SGT. MICHAEL DEAN, DET. LT. K. FRY, ANNIE P. ROTH and others
Plaintiff:
JAVIER GOMEZ, GOMEZ FAMILY, ELIZABETH GOMEZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradley v. Correctional Health Services
as 2:2018cv00854
Plaintiff:
Joseph Michael Bradley
Defendant:
Correctional Health Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WESTOVER v. KRUEGER
as 2:2018cv00158
Respondent:
J. E. KRUEGER
Petitioner:
MICHAEL BRADLEY WESTOVER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
United States v. Westover
as 17-8013
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MICHAEL BRADLEY WESTOVER
Westover v. United States of America
as 1:2016cv00112
Petitioner:
Michael Bradley Westover
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
David Bradley v. Debra Sauers, et al
as 13-1503
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID MICHAEL BRADLEY
Defendant - Appellee:
DEBRA SAUERS and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Robinson-Brown v. Cook County Municipality et al
as 1:2012cv09772
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Robinson-Brown
Defendant:
Cook County Municipality, Thomas Dart, Scott Michael Bradley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
