Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Vasquez et al v. Reed et al
as 3:2017cv03242
Plaintiff:
Anthony Vasquez , George Woodard , Julius Sangster and others
Defendant:
Marvin Reed, Orr, Burtle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Vasquez et al v. Reed et al
as 1:2017cv04051
Plaintiff:
Anthony Vasquez , George Woodard , Julius Sangster and others
Defendant:
Marvin Reed, Orr, Burtle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mario Ramos Hinojos, Jr. v. NFN Bush, Warden
as 15-6867
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARIO RAMOS HINOJOS, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
NFN BUSH, Warden
Hinojos v. Bush
as 2:2014cv02960
Petitioner:
Mario Ramos Hinojos, Jr
Respondent:
NFN Bush
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hinojos v. South Carolina Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2013cv01900
Plaintiff:
Mario Ramos Hinojos, Jr
Defendant:
William Byars, Michael McCall, Anthony Padula and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Orlando Rosa v. Collin McKenzie, et al
as 11-56967
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ORLANDO ROSA
Defendant - Appellee:
COLLIN MCKENZIE, Transportation Official, in his official capacity, AKA McKenzie, ARNOLD MATHIAS, Deputy, San Bernardino Police Dept, in his official capacity, AKA Mathis, MARIO RAMOS, Transportation Official, in his official capacity, AKA Ramos and others
Ramos v. USA
as 10-5128
Petitioner - Appellant:
Mario Ramos
Respondent - Appellee:
United States of America
Mario Ramos v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 09-51122
Petitioner - Appellant:
MARIO RAMOS
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Ramos v. USA
as 1:2009cv03500
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Mario Ramos
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Ramos v. Quarterman
as 5:2007cv00493
Petitioner:
Mario Ramos
Respondent:
Nathaniel A. Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
