Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 58
KING v. HARDDEN et al
as 1:2024cv05442
Plaintiff: GARY MICHAEL KING
Defendant: REV. P. HARDDEN, SGT. E. HEADLEY and KESHIA FISHER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Scarborough et al
as 3:2022cv00589
Plaintiff: Steven Michael King
Defendant: J. J. Scarborough, John (last name unknown) and Larry Sizemore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bryant v. Gomez et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2022cv12169
Plaintiff: Chad Eric Bryant
Defendant: Miguel Gomez, Ebony Rasco, Bobby Jo Villanueva and others
Michael King v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, et al
as 22-12739
Petitioner / Appellant: MICHAEL KING
Respondent / Appellee: SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04803
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Conlan v. King et al
as 1:2021cv00324
Defendant: John Doe (1 thru 5) and Michael King
Plaintiff: Joshua Adam Conlan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dayter v. Czerwinski et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 9:2020cv01151
Defendant: Dilon Cody, Officer Zackary Knobloc, Officer Adam Smaldon and others
Plaintiff: Nicholas Dayter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santos v. Lubbock Police Department et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2020cv00205
Defendant: Martha Castillo, Michael Welty, Michael King and others
Plaintiff: Jacinto Guzman Santos, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. City of Chicago
as 1:2019cv07370
Defendant: City of Chicago
Plaintiff: Michael King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Bishop
as 1:2019cv07253
Defendant: City Of Chicago and Bishop
Plaintiff: Michael King
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?