Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Pattison v. Lombardo et al.
as 3:2022cv00537
Plaintiff:
Dante H. Pattison
Defendant:
Sheriff Joe Lombardo, Brian Sandoval, Steve Sisolak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trost v. Nevada Board of Prison Commissioners et al
as 3:2022cv00214
Plaintiff:
Roy Trost and Daisy Lynne Meadows
Defendant:
Nevada Board of Prison Commissioners, Steve Sisolak, Charles Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCabe v. NDOC Inmate Banking Services et al
as 3:2020cv00328
Defendant:
L. Irvin, Nathan Hughes, Isidro Baca and others
Plaintiff:
Dennis McCabe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Schenker v. Adamson et al
as 3:2019cv00459
Defendant:
Utilization Review Panel, Kim Adamson, Home Town Health Care and others
Plaintiff:
Karl W. Schenker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Connors v. Walsh et al
as 3:2019cv00242
Defendant:
Silvia Irvin, Nevada Department of Corrections, Nathan Hughes and others
Plaintiff:
William John Connors, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TURNER v. HUGHES et al
as 2:2017cv00269
Defendant:
KEVIN ADAMS, BERT ALLEN, TULLEY ANDERSON and others
Miscellaneou:
PUTNAMVILLE CF (Court Use Only)
Plaintiff:
SHANE M. TURNER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marcelli v. Mar et al
as 3:2014cv00683
Defendant:
Nathan Hughes, David Mar, Nevada Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Michael Marcelli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander v. Hughes et al
as 3:2014cv00686
Plaintiff:
Demetri Alexander
Defendant:
Nathan Hughes and Lisa Walsh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. Corizon Medical Services Inc
as 5:2014cv00404
Plaintiff:
Nathan Hughes
Defendant:
Corizon Medical Services Inc, Burl, Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hughes v. Ludwick
as 2:2008cv11353
Petitioner:
Nathan Hughes
Respondent:
Nick Ludwick
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
