Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Patricia Williams v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-10463
Petitioner:
PATRICIA WILLIAMS
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Barnes v. Hochul et al
as 9:2023cv01490
Plaintiff:
Jessie J. Barnes
Defendant:
Hon. Kath C. Hochul, Richard C. Finnegan, Marisa Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Florida Department of Corrections
as 2:2023cv14114
Plaintiff:
Patricia Williams
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
RUSHING v. WILLIAM et al
as 1:2023cv00260
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH A. RUSHING
Defendant:
PATRICIA WILLIAM, JASON CARTER, CENTURIUN MEDICAL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Khalil v. Department of Corrections
as 23-30026
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Ashraf Khalil
Defendant / Appellee:
Department of Corrections, Dustin Bickham and Patricia Williams
Trim v. Bickham et al
as 3:2022cv00460
Plaintiff:
Joseph Trim, Sr.
Defendant:
E. Dustin Bickham, Patricia Williams, Stephanie Simpson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trim v. Bickham et al
as 3:2022cv00459
Plaintiff:
Joseph Trim, Sr.
Defendant:
Edward D. Bickham, Dan LeFleur and Patricia Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Khalil v. Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv00466
Plaintiff:
Ashraf Khalil
Defendant:
Dept of Corrections, Dustin Bickham and Patricia Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Khalil v. Corrections et al
as 5:2021cv02076
Plaintiff:
Ashraf Khalil
Defendant:
Dept of Corrections, Dustin Bickham and Patricia Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS et al v. VITNER et al
as 2:2018cv01221
Plaintiff:
KENNETH WILLIAMS, PATRICIA WILLIAMS and ASHLEY EDMUNDS
Defendant:
JAMES VINTNER, CHAD CASSEL, SCHURR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
