Cases 1 - 10 of 15
(HC) Lopez Galindo v. Warden
as 2:2023cv00572
Petitioner:
Pedero Lopez Galindo and Pedro Lopez Galindo
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Herlong and Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Willis v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2022cv00125
Plaintiff:
Steven Dawayne Willis
Defendant:
State of Oregon, County of Multnomah, City of Portland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willis v. Interian-Pacho et al
as 3:2022cv00105
Plaintiff:
Steven Dawayne Willis
Defendant:
Officer D. Interian-Pacho, Officer Felipe Pedro-Lopez, Detective Meredith Hopper and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willis v. City of Portland et al
as 3:2022cv00050
Plaintiff:
Steven Dawayne Willis
Defendant:
City of Portland, Portland Police Bureau, Officer D. Iterian-Pacho and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Willis v. Portland Police Bureau et al
as 3:2021cv01741
Plaintiff:
Steven Dawayne Willis
Defendant:
Portland Police Bureau, Felipe Pedro-Lopez, Interian-Pacho and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia v. Davis
as 2:2018cv00008
Petitioner:
Pedro Lopez Garcia
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lopez v. Corizon Health Care Services et al
as 2:2017cv04383
Plaintiff:
Pedro Lopez
Defendant:
Corizon Health Care Services and Charles Ryan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pedro Lopez v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 17-40471
Petitioner - Appellant:
PEDRO LOPEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Lopez-Torres v. USA
as 5:2016cv00331
Petitioner:
Pedro Lopez-Torres
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Sanchez v. USA (2255-2:14-cr-0245 KJM)
as 2:2016cv01902
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Pedro Lopez Sanchez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
