Cases 1 - 10 of 897
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Kevin Marquis Price v. David Holbrook et al
as 5:2024cv01256
Plaintiff:
Kevin Marquis Price
Defendant:
David Holbrook, Jesse Suarez and Shina Patel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Holbrook et al
as 5:2024cv03474
Plaintiff:
Kevin Price
Defendant:
David Holbrook, Jesse Suarez and Shina Patel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Charleston County et al
as 6:2024cv03237
Plaintiff:
Nekeya Jones
Defendant:
Charleston County, Charleston County Sheriff's Office, Wellpath LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00075
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Brooks v. Penzone et al
as 2:2024cv01141
Plaintiff:
Solomon Brooks and King Solomon Sekhemre El Neter
Defendant:
Paul Penzone, Kevin McMahill, Andrea Kever and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00144
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00140
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
