Cases 1 - 10 of 205
Kinard, Christian v. Marczewski, Lt. et al
as 3:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Christian Kindard and Christian Kinard
Defendant:
Lt. Marczewski, Captain Peters, Captain Bonfiglio and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Mack v. Schwarzneggar et al
as 2:2024cv01221
Plaintiff:
Anthony E. Mack
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzneggar, Edmund G. Brown, Gavin Newsom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Albert Young v. Rashaun Robinson, et al
as 24-10210
Plaintiff:
ALBERT DEMETRIUS YOUNG
Defendant:
RASHAUN ROBINSON, SARAFINO LOVETTO, GABRIEL BROOKS and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04424
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
Annie Oliver, et al v. Tommy Greenwell, et al
as 23-3285
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Annie Lee Oliver, Jeremy Wright and Estate of Michael Benford, Jeremy Wright, Personal Representative
Defendant / Appellee:
Tommy Greenwell, Individually and In His Official Capacity, Pemiscot County, JoAnn Prater and others
Montgomery v. Jenkins et al
as 3:2015cv50098
Defendant:
Michael Evans, Kelly Herrick, Joseph Yurkovich and others
Plaintiff:
Wade Montgomery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Petty v. Garrido
as 23-10425
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Adolphus Petty
Defendant / Appellee:
Warden FNU Garrido, FNU Swan, A.W., FNU McMannis, A.W. and others
Shannon et al v. Burberry et al
as 5:2023cv00086
Plaintiff:
Mark Shannon, Jeff Tucker, William Peters and others
Defendant:
West Burberry and Bourbon County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Arnett v. Oklahoma State of et al
as 5:2023cv00180
Plaintiff:
Joshua C Arnett
Defendant:
Oklahoma State of, David W Prater, Cameron M Burwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
