Cases 1 - 10 of 168
Purdue #113333 v. Arizona Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2024cv01121
Plaintiff:
Jacob J Purdue
Defendant:
Arizona Department of Corrections, M Shiro, C Ryan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carstarphen v. Reynolds et al
as 1:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Andre Maurice Carstarphen, Jr.
Defendant:
Noah Price Oliver, Q. Brown, Level Reynolds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
SAVAGE v. PURDUE PHARMA et al
as 2:2023cv04830
Plaintiff:
KEVIN EDWARD SAVAGE
Defendant:
PURDUE PHARMA, JOHNSON AND JOHNSON, MCKESSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hegge v. Inslee et al
as 2:2023cv00346
Plaintiff:
Alvin Hegge and Alvin L Hegge
Defendant:
Jay Inslee, Robert Ferguson, Todd Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin Johnson v. Martin Purdue, et al
as 23-2478
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEVIN JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
MARTIN PURDUE, EASTER ROSE, Doctor, Psychiartrist, PCF, MS. NORTHCUTT and others
Alvin Hegge v. Jay Inslee, et al
as 23-35112
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALVIN L HEGGE
Defendant / Appellee:
JAY INSLEE, ROBERT FERGUSON, TODD COLEMAN and others
Alvin Hegge v. Jay Inslee, et al
as 22-36054
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALVIN HEGGE, Representative under Fed R Civ P Rule 23(a)
Defendant / Appellee:
JAY INSLEE, ROBERT FERGUSON, TODD COLEMAN and others
Walker v. Brookhart et al
as 3:2022cv01162
Plaintiff:
James E. Walker
Defendant:
D. Brookhart, Ethan McQueen, Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Purdle v. Grimes et al
as 2:2022cv02105
Plaintiff:
Kencey Purdle
Defendant:
. Grimes, John Doe and . Purdue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Purdle v. Grimes et al
as 3:2022cv01044
Plaintiff:
Kencey Purdle
Defendant:
Grimes, John Doe 1, Purdue and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
