Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Jenkins v. Haines et al
as 1:2020cv03062
Defendant:
John Doe, P. Osmani, SGT Ducay and others
Plaintiff:
Robert L Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Jenkins v. Marshall Fisher, Commissioner, et al
as 17-60043
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERT L. JENKINS
Respondent - Appellee:
MARSHALL L. FISHER, COMMISSIONER, MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and RON KING, Superintendent, Central Mississippi Correctional Facility
Jenkins v. McCarty et al
as 1:2015cv00028
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Jenkins
Defendant:
Ron King and Marshall L. Fisher
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jenkins v. McCarty et al
as 3:2014cv00969
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Jenkins
Defendant:
Richard McCarty and Ron King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robert Jenkins v. SC Department of Correction
as 11-6039
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT LEE JENKINS, a/k/a Robert L. Jenkins
Defendant - Appellee:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, GREGORY KNOWLIN, Warden, Turbeville Correctional Institution, SHERRI SCOTT, Sergeant TCI and others
JENKINS et al v. LOWE'S HOME CENTER, INC. et al
as 7:2010cv00071
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. JENKINS and CAROLINE J. BARNES
Defendant:
LOWE'S HOME CENTER, INC., JOHN DOE I, CORBIN NEELEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JENKINS et al v. LOWE'S HOME CENTER, INC. et al
as 1:2010cv00366
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. JENKINS and CAROLINE J. BARNES
Defendant:
LOWE'S HOME CENTER, INC., JOHN DOE I, CORBIN NEELEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jenkins v. State of Mississippi, et al
as 1:2009cv00806
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Jenkins
Defendant:
State of Mississippi and Melvin Brisolara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jenkins v. State of Mississippi
as 1:2009cv00355
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Jenkins
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
