Cases 1 - 10 of 10
PONGRACZ v. TREATMENT TRENDS, INC. et al
as 5:2022cv02535
Plaintiff:
JENNIFER J PONGRACZ
Defendant:
TREATMENT TRENDS, INC. doing business as KEENAN HOUSE, SHARON MOORE, JACK GOLDBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DIAZ v. SOLHEIM
as 1:2020cv02899
Petitioner:
ROBERTO DIAZ
Respondent:
BRIAN SOLHEIM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Diaz v. United States of America et al
as 1:2019cv03181
Defendant:
The Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States of America and United States Attorney General
Plaintiff:
Robert Diaz and Roberto Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Diaz v. MDC Brooklyn et al
as 1:2017cv03768
Plaintiff:
Roberto Diaz
Defendant:
MDC Brooklyn and Mrs. Rivera
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz v. Secretary of Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2014cv23792
Plaintiff:
Roberto Diaz
Defendant:
Secretary of Florida Department of Corrections and The Attorney General of the State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Fragoso v. Immigration and Customs Enforcement
as 5:2013cv02548
Plaintiff:
Roberto Diaz Fragoso
Defendant:
Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Homeland Security Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Diaz v. United States of America
as 1:2013cv02743
Respondent:
United States Of America
Petitioner:
Roberto Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Diaz v. United States of America
as 9:2009cv81659
Plaintiff:
Roberto Diaz
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Diaz v. Hickey
as 2:2008cv00156
Petitioner:
Roberto Diaz
Respondent:
Debra Hickey
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Diaz-Rueda v. USA
as 3:2008cv00003
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Roberto Diaz-Rueda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
