Cases 1 - 10 of 12
(PC) Johnson v. Cates et al
as 1:2023cv00437
Plaintiff:
Sedric Eugene Johnson
Defendant:
Brian Cates, Pat Horn, Lt R Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Cates et al
as 3:2023cv00415
Plaintiff:
Sedric Eugene Johnson
Defendant:
Brian Cates, Pat Horn, R. Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2021cv00035
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Flores v. USA
as 6:2019cv00016
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Mateo Raymond Flores, III
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Flores v. Cody Scott et al
as 5:2012cv00124
Plaintiff:
Joe Raymond Flores
Defendant:
Cody Scott, NFN Howell, Stacy Slavich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Joe Flores v. Kevin Prince, et al
as 12-10318
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOE RAYMOND FLORES
Defendant - Appellee:
KEVIN PRINCE, PA-DMS Clinic for HCV, JOHN C. KEY, M.D., Joe Ney Unit, DEBBIE IREDELL, Registered Nurse, HS Administrator Sanders Estes Unit and others
Flores v. Prince et al
as 3:2011cv02194
Plaintiff:
Joe Raymond Flores
Defendant:
Kevin Prince, John C Key, Debbie Iredell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maurice Dunbar v. James Mett
as 11-6716
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAURICE DUNBAR
Plaintiff:
REGINALD C. MACK, LLOYD BENNETT, TERENCE HAYES and others
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES METTS, in charge of Lexington County Detention Center and CITY COUNCIL, or Person Oursee of the Courts
Flores v. Cate et al
as 2:2010cv02832
Plaintiff:
Raymond Flores
Defendant:
M. Cate, Warden Deuel Vocational Institution and Chief Medical Officer, Deuel Vocational Institution
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunbar et al v. Mack et al
as 8:2010cv01775
Plaintiff:
Maurice Dunbar, Reginald C Mack, Lloyd Bennett and others
Defendant:
James Metts and City Council
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
