Cases 1 - 10 of 18
Ramirez v. Pfeiffer
as 2:2017cv00619
Petitioner:
Richard Ramirez
Respondent:
Christian Pfeiffer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Abdul-Aziz Muhammad v. Dane Heady
as 17-6081
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ABDUL-AZIZ RASHID MUHAMMAD
Defendant - Appellee:
DANE HEADY, Retired Unit Manager, MICHAEL WEAVER, Health Service Administrator, EDDIE ANDERSON, DO and others
Muhammad v Heady et al
as 1:2014cv00088
Plaintiff:
Abdul-Aziz Rashid Muhammad
Defendant:
Dane Heady, Michael Weaver, Eddie Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
William Webb v. Mr. Orsolit
as 12-6653
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM EUGENE WEBB
Defendant - Appellee:
JORGES VAZQUEZ, HERMAN BRANSON, RICHARD RAMIREZ and others
Defendant:
JOE DRIVER, MR. MARTINEZ, FOOD SERVICE ADMINIS GREENWALL and others
Ramirez v. Robinson
as 2:2011cv01199
Plaintiff:
Richard Ramirez
Defendant:
Richard Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Baker et al
as 6:2011cv00152
Plaintiff:
Steven Le Andre Johnson
Defendant:
K. Bennett Baker, Adam Morrow, B. Burchett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Odell Griffin v. USA, et al
as 11-5534
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ODELL GRIFFIN
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
BUREAU OF PRISONS, L. GREGORY, HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Director and others
Spencer v. Wilson et al
as 6:2011cv00128
Plaintiff:
Bart Spencer
Defendant:
Eric D. Wilson, Rush, Willard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Odell Griffin v. Harley Lappin, et al
as 10-5457
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ODELL GRIFFIN
Defendant - Appellee:
HARLEY LAPPIN, aka Harley G. Lappin, ERIC WILSON, Warden, US Penitentiary, L. GREGORY, Hospital Administrator US Penitentiary and others
Jones v. Ramirez et al
as 1:2010cv00289
Plaintiff:
Sean Corey Jones
Defendant:
Richard Ramirez, Robert Ellis, Jeffrey Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
