Cases 1 - 10 of 81
(PC) Rushdan v. Soares, et al.,
as 2:2024cv01768
Defendant:
Jennifer S. Bunker, Jennifer Soares and Board of Parole Hearings
Plaintiff:
Amir Saladin Rushdan, Robert Stanley Woods and Saladin Rushdan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. SCDPS et al
as 3:2024cv00038
Plaintiff:
Jerome Garcia
Defendant:
SCDPS, Trooper Wayne Davidson, South Carolina Public Safety and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Robert S Woods v. Warden
as 8:2023cv00986
Petitioner:
Robert S Woods
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Woods v. Warden
as 2:2023cv01002
Petitioner:
Robert S Woods and Robert S. Woods
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Woods v. Weber
as 1:2023cv00900
Petitioner:
Robert D. Woods
Respondent:
Ronald S. Weber
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
WOODS v. RAWLEY et al
as 1:2022cv01594
Plaintiff:
ROBERT S. WOODS
Defendant:
M. RAWLEY and D. REAGLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WOODS v. RAWLEY
as 1:2022cv00875
Plaintiff:
ROBERT S. WOODS, II
Defendant:
M. RAWLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Woods v. Haar, et al
as 22-55253
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT STANLEY WOODS, AKA Saladin Rushdan
Defendant / Appellee:
DOCTOR HAAR, DOCTOR BREEN, DOCTOR TAYLOR and others
Woods v. South Carolina, State of
as 1:2022cv00184
Petitioner:
Robert Wilson Woods
Respondent:
South Carolina, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reaves v. Dickens et al
as 4:2022cv00318
Plaintiff:
Kathy Juanita Reaves
Defendant:
Charles M. Dickens, South Carolina Highway Patrol, South Carolina Department of Public Safety and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
