Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Adams v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv02029
Plaintiff:
Robert Christopher Adams and Miles
Defendant:
John Doe, Tom Dart and City of Chicago
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Dart et al
as 1:2024cv01420
Plaintiff:
Robert Christopher Adams and Miles
Defendant:
Tom Dart, C.O. Guzman and Sgt. Collins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. City of Chicago et al
as 1:2024cv01124
Plaintiff:
Robert Christopher Adams and Miles
Defendant:
City of Chicago, John Doe, Director to get names of Doctor's and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Adams v. Zach Cook
as 23-3238
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT CHRISTOPHER ADAMS
Defendant / Appellee:
ZACH COOK, Sgt.
McDaniel v. USA
as 1:2023cv00409
Petitioner:
Robert Christopher McDaniel
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00388
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Jefferys et al
as 3:2022cv02695
Plaintiff:
Robert Christopher Adams
Defendant:
Rob Jefferys and John/Jane Doe 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. State of Illinois et al
as 3:2022cv03031
Plaintiff:
Robert Christopher Adams
Defendant:
State of Illinois, Brittany Greene, Rob Jeffreys and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Cook et al
as 3:2022cv03016
Plaintiff:
Robert Christopher Adams
Defendant:
Zachary R Cook, Mark D Many, Brittany P Greene and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McCoy v. USP Coleman I et al
as 5:2021cv00559
Plaintiff:
Robert Christopher McCoy
Defendant:
USP Coleman I, B. M. Antonelli, Federal Bureau of Prisions and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
