Prisoner Petitions Cases
Gordon v. Rardin We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv11315
Petitioner: Robert Donald Gordon
Respondent: E. Rardin
Gordon v. USA
as 2:2020cv10475
Respondent: United States of America
Petitioner: Robert Donald Gordon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
McCollum v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2015cv01026
Petitioner: Robert Donald McCollum
Respondent: Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and Attorney General, State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McCollum v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2015cv00544
Petitioner: Robert Donald McCollum
Respondent: Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McCollum v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2015cv00429
Petitioner: Robert Donald McCollum
Respondent: Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hutt v. Corrections Corporation of America et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv00209
Plaintiff: Robert Donald Hutt
Defendant: Corrections Corporation of America, Iman Gonzalez, Keith Ivens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
TURNER v. KELLER We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2009cv00879
Petitioner: ROBERT DONALD TURNER
Respondent: ALVIN W. KELLER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Duck v. Riley et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2009cv00194
Plaintiff: Robert Donald Duck, Jr.
Defendant: Bob Riley, Troy King and Alabama Department of Public Safety
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duck v. Riley et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2008cv00194
Plaintiff: Robert Donald Duck, Jr.
Defendant: Bob Riley, Troy King and Alabama Department of Public Safety
Cause Of Action: Federal Question

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?