Cases 1 - 10 of 53
Long v. Garland et al
as 4:2023cv40169
Petitioner:
James Robert Long
Respondent:
Merrick Garland and Warden Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rubinstein et al v. United States of America
as 2:2023cv12685
Petitioner:
Jacob Rubinstein, Jeffrey Armstrong, Thomas Bauer and others
Respondent:
United States of America
LONG v. GOURLEY et al
as 2:2023cv01909
Petitioner:
ROBERT LONG
Respondent:
MICHAEL GOURLEY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Long, Jr. v. Bookheimer et al
as 1:2022cv01230
Plaintiff:
John Robert Long, Jr.
Defendant:
Captain Bookheimer, Morris Houser, Sgt. Flaherty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Long, Jr. v. SCI-Benner Township
as 1:2022cv00886
Plaintiff:
John Robert Long, Jr.
Defendant:
SCI-Benner Township
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seyler v. Briney et al
as 9:2022cv00094
Plaintiff:
Dustin Lee Seyler
Defendant:
Paul Briney, William Barron, Gale Decker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Washburn v. Briney et al
as 9:2022cv00086
Plaintiff:
Billy Washburn, Jr.
Defendant:
Paul Briney, William Barron, Gale Decker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alsop v. Briney et al
as 9:2022cv00064
Plaintiff:
Bart Lee Alsop and Dustin Lee Seyler
Defendant:
Paul Briney, William Barron, Gale Decker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McIntyre v. Briney et al
as 9:2022cv00061
Plaintiff:
Raymond McIntyre
Defendant:
Paul Briney, William Barron, Gale Decker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Birdsley v. Briney et al
as 9:2022cv00062
Plaintiff:
Jacob Birdsley
Defendant:
Paul Briney, William Barron, Gale Decker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
