Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Rodney Hurdsman v. Rodney Wright, et al
as 24-1997
Plaintiff:
Rodney Adam Hurdsman
Defendant:
Viapath Technologies, Inc., formerly known as Globel Tel-Link, Rodney Wright, Sheriff, Saline County, Saline County, Arkansas and others
Hurdsman v. Cozby et al
as 1:2023cv00099
Petitioner:
Rodney Adam Hurdsman
Respondent:
Jennifer Cozby and Colette Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hurdsman v. Peters
as 1:2023cv00084
Petitioner:
Rodney Adam Hurdsman
Respondent:
Colette Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hurdsman v. Peters
as 3:2023cv00780
Petitioner:
Rodney Adam Hurdsman
Respondent:
Colette Peters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Hurdsman v. USA
as 4:2023cv00315
Petitioner:
Rodney Adam Hurdsman
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rodney Adams v. Riverside County Larry D. Smith Correctional Facility
as 5:2022cv01636
Plaintiff:
Rodney Adams
Defendant:
Riverside County Larry D. Smith Correctional Facility, Stan Lee, Jorge Hernandez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hurdsman v. Lumpkin
as 22-10280
Petitioner / Appellant:
Rodney Adam Hurdsman
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Hurdsman v. USA
as 4:2022cv00312
Petitioner:
Rodney Adam Hurdsman
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hurdsman v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2021cv00427
Petitioner:
Rodney Adam Hurdsman
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rodney Hurdsman v. Cadell, et al
as 15-11271
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RODNEY A. HURDSMAN, also known as Rodney Adam Hurdsman
Defendant - Appellee:
NFN CADELL, Deputy, Wise County Sheriff's Office, HODGES, Deputy, Wise County Sheriff's Office, ROGERS, Deputy, Wise County Sheriff's Office and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
