Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Keith Warren v. NDOC, et al
as 22-16099
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEITH A. WARREN
Defendant / Appellee:
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, S. POWERS, HAROLD WICKHAM and others
Keith Warren v. S. Powers, et al
as 22-15338
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEITH A. WARREN
Defendant / Appellee:
S. POWERS, CHANDRA THOMAS, HAROLD WICKHAM and others
Moler v. USA et al
as 2:2020cv00876
Defendant:
J Mayeaux, Ian Connors, Kedric Gasaway and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur Flemming Moler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moler v. USA et al
as 2:2020cv00981
Defendant:
J Mayeaux, Ian Connors, Kedric Gasaway and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur Flemming Moler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moler v. United States of America et al
as 2:2020cv01908
Defendant:
K. Richard, J. Mayeaux, Kedric Gasaway and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur Flemming Moler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Moler v. Baty et al
as 2:2019cv00809
Defendant:
Ms Brown, Tecora Ballom, T Welch and others
Plaintiff:
Arthur Flemming Moler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Warren v. Nev. Dept. of Corr. et al
as 3:2017cv00228
Defendant:
Nevada Department of Corrections, Nevada, State of, S. Powers and others
Plaintiff:
Keith A. Warren
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Watts v. Oregon Board of Parole et al
as 6:2013cv02010
Respondent:
D. Baker, Oregon Board of Parole, S. Powers and others
Petitioner:
Rudean Watts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boyd v. Arizona, State of et al
as 2:2011cv00828
Plaintiff:
Donald E Boyd
Defendant:
Arizona, State of, Maricopa, County of, Maricopa County Prosecutor's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donald Boyd v. State of AZ, et al
as 10-4536
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONALD E. BOYD
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF AZ, MARICOPA CTY AZ, MARICOPA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE and others
Defendant - Appellant:
MARICOPA CTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
