Cases 1 - 10 of 57
Jackson v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 9:2021cv00100
Defendant:
Arron Thompkins, Brian Collier, Janet Haney and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Roy Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 6:2021cv00227
Defendant:
Arron Thompkins, Brian Collier, Janet Haney and others
Plaintiff:
Samuel Roy Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Lumpkin
as 4:2020cv03465
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
Samuel Roy Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson v. Lumpkin
as 4:2020cv03023
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Petitioner:
Samuel Roy Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson v. USA
as 2:2019cv04920
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Samuel Dean Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Jackson et al v. Department of Criminal Justice-Parole Divsion, Pamela Thelke et al
as 4:2019cv02939
Respondent:
Persons under Color as U.S. District Judges and Clerks, Deputy Clerks, District Courts, Austin and Waco Divisions, U.S. District and Appeals Courts, District of Columbia per persons misrepresenators of Judges, Clerks, and deputy clerks, Department of Criminal Justice-Parole Divsion, Pamela Thelke and others
Petitioner:
Samuel James Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson v. NC Department of Public Safety
as 5:2019hc02156
Respondent:
NC Department of Public Safety
Petitioner:
Samuel Junior Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 4:2018cv00439
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Samuel D Jackson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jackson v. True
as 3:2018cv00713
Petitioner:
Samuel Beck Jackson
Respondent:
William True
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Jackson v. True
as 3:2018cv00612
Petitioner:
Samuel Beck Jackson
Respondent:
William True
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
