Cases 1 - 10 of 20
JOHNSON v. PADGETT et al
as 5:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
SCOTT A JOHNSON
Defendant:
R PADGETT and R GIBSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. OBERLANDER et al
as 5:2022cv02171
Petitioner:
SCOTT DAVID JOHNSON
Respondent:
DERICK F. OBERLANDER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BERKS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOHNSON v. SHULER et al
as 4:2022cv00064
Plaintiff:
SCOTT ALLAN JOHNSON
Defendant:
J SHULER, K PEARSON, MERCER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. DOE 1 et al
as 4:2020cv00579
Defendant:
JANE DOE, JOHN DOE 3, JOHN DOE 2 and others
Plaintiff:
SCOTT ALLAN JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saunders v. Raleigh County et al
as 5:2020cv00221
Defendant:
Charles R. Humphreys, The Honorable Adam Dimlich, T A Bowers and others
Plaintiff:
Rayco Saunders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Gray County Sheriff's Office
as 2:2019cv00215
Petitioner:
Scott E Johnson, Jr
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID and Gray County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv01145
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Scott Johnson v. United States
as 16-4444
Petitioner - Appellant:
Scott L. Johnson
Respondent - Appellee:
United States of America
Johnson v. Fields
as 7:2016cv00394
Defendant:
Lt. FNU Abolos, Mark Donaldson, Capt. FNU Fields and others
Plaintiff:
Scott Allen Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. State of Texas
as 7:2016cv00365
Respondent:
Sheriff Mark Donaldson, Mike Griffis and State of Texas
Notice Only Party:
Laura Haney
Petitioner:
Scott Allen Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
