Cases 1 - 10 of 171
Speight-Bey v. Goldson
as 3:2023cv00755
Petitioner:
Morris Speight-Bey
Respondent:
Ms. Obelinda Goldson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00188
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SPEIGHT-BEY v. GOLDSON
as 2:2023cv01654
Petitioner:
MORRIS SPEIGHT-BEY
Respondent:
OBELINDA GOLDSON, MS. and MS. OBELINDA GOLDSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Speight-Bey v. United States Parole Commissioner
as 5:2022hc02171
Petitioner:
Morris Speight-Bey
Respondent:
United States Parole Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
(PC) Robinson v. Catlin et al
as 2:2022cv01585
Plaintiff:
Javaughn K. Robinson
Defendant:
Catlin, C/O Ayala, Simmons and others
Respondent:
C/O Bell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Catlin et al
as 4:2022cv04933
Plaintiff:
Javaughn K. Robinson
Defendant:
Catlin, Ayala, Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CUNNINGHAM v. GOLDEN et al
as 5:2021cv00225
Plaintiff:
NEALLY CUNNINGHAM
Defendant:
GOLDEN, SPEIGHTS, HEWETT and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cunningham v. Golden et al
as 5:2021cv00560
Plaintiff:
Neally Cunningham
Defendant:
FNU Golden, FNU Speights, FNU Hewett and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
DAVIDSON v. AKUNWANNE et al
as 1:2021cv00132
Plaintiff:
GERALD A DAVIDSON
Defendant:
Doctor IKECHUKWU AKUNWANNE, Warden WALTER BERRY, LIEUTENANT STEPHEN FOSTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIDSON v. AKUNWANNE et al
as 5:2021cv00241
Plaintiff:
GERALD A DAVIDSON
Defendant:
Doctor IKECHUKWU AKUNWANNE, Warden WALTER BERRY, LIEUTENANT STEPHEN FOSTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
