Cases 1 - 10 of 117
Steven Michael Banks Hubbard Jr. v. Bureau of Prisons Rubidoux RRC
as 2:2024cv00386
Petitioner:
Steven Michael Banks Hubbard Jr.
Respondent:
Bureau of Prisons Rubidoux RRC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Aitken v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 3:2023cv01418
Plaintiff:
Steven Michael Aitken
Defendant:
Polk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) Lopez v. Hixton
as 1:2023cv01368
Petitioner:
Steven Michael Lopez
Respondent:
Kevin Hixton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bogovich v. Crisman
as 3:2023cv03162
Plaintiff:
Steven Michael Bogovich, Jr
Defendant:
. Crisman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King v. Scarborough et al
as 3:2022cv00589
Plaintiff:
Steven Michael King
Defendant:
J. J. Scarborough, John (last name unknown) and Larry Sizemore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Knight v. Nobles et al
as 2:2022cv00132
Plaintiff:
Steven Michael Knight
Defendant:
Sheriff Mitch Nobles, Danny Meritt, Allen Crocker and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Steinpreis v. Meisner
as 2:2022cv00933
Petitioner:
Steven Michael Steinpreis
Respondent:
Warden Michael Meisner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
AITKEN v. DIXON et al
as 4:2022cv00197
Plaintiff:
STEVEN MICHAEL AITKEN
Defendant:
MR R DIXON, MR CONNER, R DIXON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
AITKEN v. CONNOR et al
as 4:2022cv00122
Plaintiff:
STEVEN MICHAEL AITKEN
Defendant:
MR CONNOR, MR R DIXON, CONNOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reaney v. Chester County Prison
as 1:2022cv00273
Plaintiff:
Steven Michael Reaney
Defendant:
Chester County Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
