Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00612
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Brady v. Kocina et al
as 2:2020cv00918
Plaintiff:
Mark J Brady
Defendant:
Marlene Larson, Kevin Carr, Susan Novak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00622
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
SPEARMAN v. WILLIAMS
as 3:2019cv00043
Defendant:
COURT REPORTER SUSAN WILLIAMS
Plaintiff:
RANDAL SPEARMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Eric Hermansen v. LaDonna Thompson, et al
as 16-6197
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ERIC LLOYD HERMANSEN
Defendant - Appellee:
LADONNA THOMPSON, KDOC Commissioner, SUSAN WILLIAMS, KDOC Dietician, JOHN/JANE DOES, KDOC Employees and others
Williams v. Kaplan
as 2:2015cv02633
Defendant:
Sabina Kaplan
Plaintiff:
Susan Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cobb v. Fitch et al
as 1:2014cv00605
Plaintiff:
Murry Cobb
Defendant:
Scott A Fitch, Susan Williams-Davis, Dr. Myzuno and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hermansen v. Thompson et al
as 5:2013cv00067
Plaintiff:
Eric Lloyd Hermansen
Defendant:
LaDonna Thompson, Susan Williams, John/Jane Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smalls v. Byars et al
as 0:2012cv01189
Plaintiff:
Robert Smalls
Defendant:
William R Byars, Jr, Levern Cohen, Edsel T Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lawrence Froman, et al v. Kentucky Department of Correct, et al
as 11-5868
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAWRENCE M. FROMAN, ERIC L. HERMANSEN and JAMES CLAWSON
Plaintiff:
DALE SCHWIEMAN, JAMES W. STEADMAN and MARK H. JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
KENTUCKY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, In it's Agency Capacity, LADONNA THOMPSON, Commissioner of KDOC in her Individual and Official Capacity, LARRY CHANDLER, Warden of the Kentucky State Reformatory in his Individual and Official capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
