Cases 1 - 10 of 180
Ike v. Sadler
as 3:2024cv00569
Plaintiff:
Larry Ike, Jr
Defendant:
Bradley T Sadler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carlson v. Ortiz et al
as 1:2023cv01439
Plaintiff:
Benjmain Carlson
Defendant:
Adrian Ortiz, Alexandria Norville, Andrew Erikson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Rowland et al
as 3:2023cv03300
Plaintiff:
Robert Morris
Defendant:
Major Rowland, Lt. Zang, Bradley Sadler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Evans et al
as 3:2023cv03302
Plaintiff:
Robert Morris
Defendant:
C/O Evans, Lt. Zang, Bradley Sadler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sadler v Rewerts
as 1:2023cv12449
Plaintiff:
Keonte Rashaad Sadler
Respondent:
Randee Rewerts
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scott v. Stevenson et al
as 7:2023cv00621
Plaintiff:
Maurice P. Scott
Defendant:
Mrs. Stevenson, Dudley and T. Sadler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Odem v. Johnson
as 23-10884
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Benny R. Odem, Jr.
Defendant / Appellee:
Jarvis O. Johnson, Mailroom Supervisor, French Robertson Unit, Stanley Baldwin, Head Chaplaincy, French Robertson Unit, Paige Rutledge, Admin IV and others
Kelley v. Stitt et al
as 5:2023cv00747
Plaintiff:
Phillip Lee Kelley, George Isbill, Rocky Ward and others
Defendant:
Kevin Stitt, Larry Morris, Adam Luck and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(PC) Watts v. Yamaguina et al
as 2:2023cv01243
Plaintiff:
Vernell Watts
Defendant:
A. Yamaguina, T. Sadler, M. Palagara and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sneed v. Commonwealth of Kentucky et al
as 3:2023cv00224
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Sneed
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Kentucky and Tanisha Sadler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
