Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv80585
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
SHERWOOD v. BOWARS et al
as 2:2023cv01567
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK A SHERWOOD, JR.
Defendant:
RICHARD BOWARS, LEANN DAVIS, SAMMIE DAVIES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Sammie King, Jr. v. Dooly SP Warden
as 23-12500
Petitioner / Appellant:
SAMMIE DAVIS KING, JR.
Respondent / Appellee:
DOOLY SP WARDEN
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
King v. State of Georgia et al
as 1:2023cv00041
Petitioner:
Sammie Davis King, Jr.
Respondent:
State of Georgia, Warren Co. Trial Court Hammond, District Attorney Dennis C. Sanders and others
Not Classified By Court:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morgan v. USA
as 2:2020cv01430
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Sammy Davis Dewitt Morgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
(HC) Morgan v. Jusino
as 2:2020cv00605
Respondent:
T. Tusino and T. Jusino
Petitioner:
Sammy Davis Dewitt Morgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(HC) Morgan v. Jusino
as 2:2020cv00603
Respondent:
T. Tusino and T. Jusino
Petitioner:
Sammy Davis Dewitt Morgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sammy Davis Dewitt Morgan v. T. Tusino
as 5:2020cv00285
Respondent:
T. Tusino
Petitioner:
Sammy Davis Dewitt Morgan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(PC) Morgan v. Sacramento Co. Department of Health Service et al
as 2:2019cv01600
Defendant:
Obshire, Sacramento Co. Department of Health Service and Patricia Lord
Plaintiff:
Sammy Davis Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Morgan v. Sacramento County Sheriffs Dept. et al
as 2:2019cv01179
Defendant:
Sacramento County Sheriffs Dept., Morgan, Sacramento County Main Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Sammy Davis Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
