Cases 1 - 10 of 282
Burkes v. Sweeny et al
as 3:2024cv00463
Defendant:
Nathaniel Sweeny, L Sands, PENDLETON CF E-FILE (Court Use Only) and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmie DeVaughn Burkes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burkes v. Sweeny et al
as 1:2024cv00234
Defendant:
N Sweeny, J Carder, L Sands and others
Plaintiff:
Jimmie DeVaughn Burkes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sands v. Nocco
as 8:2024cv01306
Defendant:
Debera Lindsay, Detective Keelie Peckam, Officer Derek Dekyser and others
Plaintiff:
Scott A. Sands and Crystal Morris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sand v. Humboldt County Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2024cv00872
Plaintiff:
Dennis Keith Sand
Defendant:
Humboldt County Correctional Facility, Sanchez, Sintic and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jerry Caldwell v. David LeMaster, et al
as 24-5118
Plaintiff:
JERRY CALDWELL
Defendant:
DAVID LEMASTER, Warden, GARY CHANEY, RN, NP J. MUSIC and others
Sands v. Sands
as 3:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Lamar Sands
Defendant:
Bernadette Sands
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Borton v. Matteucci et al
as 6:2024cv00204
Plaintiff:
Michael Borton
Defendant:
Delores Matteucci, Oregon Health Authority, Oregon State Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Freeman v. Bowers et al
as 4:2024cv00414
Plaintiff:
Berry Raydell Freeman
Defendant:
Rodger E. Bowers, Dustin T Wanders, Christopher N. Garcia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Irvin v. Google.com et al
as 4:2023cv06659
Plaintiff:
Matthew Irvin
Defendant:
Google.com, YouTube.com, Alexis Bynes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sands v. May
as 1:2023cv02222
Petitioner:
Joseph A. Sands
Respondent:
Warden Harold May
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
