Cases 1 - 10 of 79
Zarate v. Biden et al
as 5:2024cv00911
Plaintiff:
Isaac Zarate
Defendant:
Clerk Blake A. Hawthorne, Clerk Mario Toscano, U.S. Congress Rep. Mike Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roberts v. Harris et al
as 3:2024cv00413
Plaintiff:
Solomon Roberts
Defendant:
Scott S. Harris and Emily Walker
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PRIESTER v. HARRIS et al
as 3:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
DAVID PRIESTER, JAMES THOMAS and DAVID JACKSON
Defendant:
SCOTT S HARRIS, GRANT MALOY, EUGENE GRINBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caraffa #350727 v. United States of America et al
as 4:2024cv00130
Plaintiff:
Alfred Erika Caraffa
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, Scott S Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Dyer v. U.S. Supreme Court et al
as 3:2024cv00493
Plaintiff:
Jewel Dyer
Defendant:
U.S. Supreme Court, Scott S. Harris and Sara Simmons
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 23-5166
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01399
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Delgen Foye v. Scott Harris
as 23-6400
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DELGEN FOYE
Defendant / Appellee:
SCOTT S. HARRIS and CLAYTON R. HIGGINS, JR.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00986
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. Pierce County Judicial System
as 3:2023cv05311
Plaintiff:
Scott A Harris
Defendant:
Pierce County Judicial System
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
