Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Daniels v. Segal
as 1:2022cv01201
Petitioner:
Christopher Sean Daniels
Respondent:
Michael Segal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Daniels v. Segal
as 1:2021cv01226
Petitioner:
Christopher Sean Daniels
Respondent:
Michael Segal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
DANIELS v. CLARK et al
as 1:2021cv00069
Petitioner:
SEAN DANIELS
Respondent:
PENNSYLVANIA BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE SECRETARY DEBORAH L. CARPENTER, SUPERINTENDENT MICAHEL CLARK and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
DANIELS v. CLARK et al
as 2:2021cv00128
Petitioner:
SEAN DANIELS
Respondent:
DEBORAH L. CARPENTER, SUPERINTENDENT MICHAEL CLARK and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Daniels v. Entzel
as 1:2020cv01129
Petitioner:
Christopher Sean Daniels
Respondent:
Frederick Entzel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Twohig v. Macomb Correctional Facility et al
as 2:2012cv11855
Plaintiff:
Sean Daniel Twohig
Defendant:
Macomb Correctional Facility, Macomb Medical Correctional Facility, Abendiena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Twohig v. Riely et al
as 2:2012cv11832
Plaintiff:
Sean Daniel Twohig
Defendant:
Riely, McCabe, Runyon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Twohig #525794 v. Macomb Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2012cv00349
Plaintiff:
Sean Daniel Twohig #525794
Defendant:
Macomb Correctional Facility, Macomb Medical Correctional Facility, Unknown Abendiena and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Twohig #525794 v. MDOC et al
as 1:2012cv00350
Plaintiff:
Sean Daniel Twohig #525794
Defendant:
Unknown Riely, Unknown McCabe, Unknown Runyon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKay v. USA
as 4:2012cv00188
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Sean Daniel McKay
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
