Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Shand v. Burgos et al
as 3:2024cv00570
Plaintiff:
Christopher Shand
Defendant:
Ruben Burgos, Mark Bounaventure, Jamal Linen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shands v. Rokosky
as 1:2023cv00772
Petitioner:
Johnny Shands, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Casolo v. Jennings et al
as 3:2023cv01055
Plaintiff:
Jeffery A. Casolo
Defendant:
Z. A. Jennings, Michael Williams, Jacksonville Sheriff's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shands v. USA
as 5:2022cv00343
Petitioner:
Marcus Arelious Shands
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Shand v. Butricks et al
as 3:2022cv00227
Plaintiff:
Christopher Shand
Defendant:
Kenneth Butricks, Jennifer Peterson, Nunez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hail et al v. WMD Sites et al
as 3:2021cv00531
Defendant:
Disability Division, N. Pelosi, Brandon Breslow and others
Plaintiff:
R. Lee, L. Hail Mackle, M.J. Christian Hail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shand v. Connecticut Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv00523
Defendant:
Syed Johar Nagvi, Ruiz, Doran and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Shand
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shand v. Rodriguez et al
as 3:2021cv00119
Defendant:
McLeod, Kyle Magoon, Kristin Carabine and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Shand
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shand v. Rodriguez et al
as 3:2020cv01268
Defendant:
Nick Rodriguez, Derrick Molden and Alphonso Lindsey
Plaintiff:
Christopher Shand
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Shand v. Warden et al
as 1:2020cv00691
Respondent:
Secretary, Warden, Field Office Director and others
Petitioner:
Lloyd Gareth Shand
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
