Cases 1 - 10 of 39
Archie Bear v. Dan Hartog, et al
as 23-3693
Plaintiff:
Archie Bear
Defendant:
Dan Hartog, Randy Gibbs, Tripp and others
Ballin v. Shepler
as 5:2023cv00038
Petitioner:
Matthew James Ballin
Respondent:
Randolph County Magistrate Ben E. Shepler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Rich v. Hartog et al
as 4:2023cv00004
Plaintiff:
Aaron Rich
Defendant:
Dan Hartog, Randy Gibbs, Tripp and others
Interested Party:
H. Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crowell v. Hartog et al
as 4:2023cv00005
Plaintiff:
Darien Crowell
Defendant:
Dan Hartog, Randy Gibbs, Tripp and others
Interested Party:
H. Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bear v. Hartog et al
as 4:2023cv00006
Plaintiff:
Archie Robert Bear
Defendant:
Dan Hartog, Randy Gibbs, Tripp and others
Interested Party:
H. Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hardin v. Hartog et al
as 4:2022cv00421
Plaintiff:
Romeo Hardin
Defendant:
Dan Hartog, Randy Gibbs, Tripp and others
Interested Party:
H. Loraine Wallace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cummings v. Dart et al
as 1:2021cv05914
Plaintiff:
Dennis Cummings
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart, Michael Pettis, Stacy Toms and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nelson v. VanHosen et al
as 9:2020cv00258
Plaintiff:
Daniel Nelson and Danny D. Nelson
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Ryan Robert, D. Dagostino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shepler, Christopher v. State of Wisconsin
as 3:2017cv00038
Petitioner:
Christopher Shepler
Respondent:
State of Wisconsin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SHEPLER v. ELBEL et al
as 2:2016cv01470
Plaintiff:
SHANE LEE SHEPLER
Defendant:
THOMAS ELBEL, DUSTIN MYERS, JEFFERSON COUNTY COMMISSIONERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
