Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Washington v. Aramark
as 3:2026cv50315
Plaintiff:
Eugene Steven Washington
Defendant:
Aramark
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Deno v. Henderson County Detention Center et al
as 4:2026cv00504
Plaintiff:
Steven Deno
Defendant:
Henderson County Detention Center and Henderson County Detention Center Medical (Western Kentucky Correctional Care)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pitts v. Southern et al
as 2:2026cv00114
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Pitts
Defendant:
Southern, T R Ball, K Randle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv04257
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Perez v. Santoro
as 5:2026cv07661
Petitioner:
Steven A Perez
Respondent:
Kelly Santoro
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sharbutt v. Rogers et al
as 5:2026cv01900
Plaintiff:
Allan Dell Sharbutt
Defendant:
David Rogers, Glenna Hailey, Steven Harpe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CLARK v. LOIS et al
as 2:2026cv05186
Plaintiff:
DORIAN CLARK and STEVEN JACOBS
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER LOIS and JUDGE HENRY LEWANDOWSKI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv04227
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv04228
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
James v. Appellant Defenders
as 3:2026cv03237
Plaintiff:
Steven James
Defendant:
Appellant Defenders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
