Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Johnson et al v. Management and Training Corporation et al
as 5:2026cv00212
Plaintiff:
Steven Edward Johnson, Jacob Wauthier and Ernest Matthews
Defendant:
Management and Training Corporation, John David Bowers, David Robles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Silva v. Blanche et al
as 3:2026cv05355
Petitioner:
Carolina Silva
Respondent:
Todd Blanche, Ronald L. Davis, Markwayne Mullins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Johnson v. Cook County Ilinois et al
as 1:2026cv11381
Petitioner:
Matthew Johnson
Respondent:
Cook County Ilinois, Eileen Burke, Cheif Judge Charles S Beach, II and others
:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Arellano v. Blanche et al
as 3:2026cv05356
Petitioner:
Elizabeth Arellano
Defendant:
Todd Blanche, Ronald L. Davis, Markwayne Mullins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Pinkston v. Reeves, et al
as 3:2026cv00755
Plaintiff:
Chaz Pinkston
Defendant:
Tate Reeves, Nathan "Burl" Cain, John Hunt and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stevens et al
as 3:2026cv00701
Plaintiff:
Theodore Stevens and Anthony Vorela
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv10439
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Null et al v. Nessel et al
as 1:2026cv02587
Defendant:
Timothy Bates, Dana Nessel, Gregory Townsend and others
Plaintiff:
Michael John Null and William Grant Null
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
McCray v. Greene County et al
as 1:2026cv00267
Plaintiff:
Steven Devon McCray
Defendant:
Greene County and SMCI
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
