Cases 1 - 10 of 78
CLARK v. PLATT et al
as 1:2024cv00710
Plaintiff:
GREGORY T. CLARK, II
Defendant:
CHAD PLATT, KEITH HARTZELL, PRETORIUS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Chambers-Smith et al.
as 3:2024cv00044
Plaintiff:
Shawan M. Johnson
Defendant:
Director Annette Chambers-Smith, Director's Desi B. Turner, Warden Kimberly Henderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Folk v. Palmer et al
as 9:2023cv05737
Plaintiff:
Courtney Folk
Defendant:
Sgt. Joyce Palmer, Lieutenant Daniel Riveta, Associate Warden Ann Sheppard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fishbourne v. Director B. Stirling et al
as 8:2023cv02474
Plaintiff:
Ricardo Fishbourne and Ricardo Fishburne
Defendant:
Director B. Stirling, Regional Director Davis, Warden Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Clark v. Wade
as 2:2023cv00706
Plaintiff:
Trevion T Clark
Defendant:
Sheriff Micheal Wade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kellum v. Jeffreys et al
as 1:2023cv01198
Plaintiff:
Brandon Kellum
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, . Meaker, Wexford Health Sources Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Askew v. Bainter et al
as 1:2023cv01153
Plaintiff:
Carl Askew
Defendant:
Kyle Bainter, . Silva, N Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Arroy v. Clark et al
as 1:2023cv01129
Plaintiff:
Marco Arroy
Defendant:
Rob Jeffries, T Clark, . Boerdner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bivens v. Clark
as 9:2023cv00778
Plaintiff:
Quatavious Bernard Bivens
Defendant:
T. Clark, Willie Davis, Joel Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clark v. May et al
as 1:2022cv01553
Petitioner:
James T. Clark
Respondent:
Robert May and Kathleen Jennings
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
