Cases 1 - 10 of 30
LOTHARP v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2019cv01029
Respondent:
ICE/HOMELAND SECURITY INVESTIGATIONS, SHERIFF/WARDEN OF STANLY COUNTY, DETECTIVE A. L. ALDRIDGE and others
Petitioner:
ZANNIE J. LOTHARP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(PC) Hunt v. Kramer et al
as 2:2018cv03025
Defendant:
C. Hahn, N. Smith, C. Gripp and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Hunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
OWEN v. CORIZON HEALTH INC et al
as 4:2014cv00460
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E OWEN
Defendant:
CORIZON HEALTH INC, B BOYD, UNIDENTIFIED PHYSICIAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ALI v. RUSS et al
as 1:2013cv00693
Plaintiff:
ELIJAH SHAKUR ALI
Defendant:
D. R. RUSS and T. H. BRANSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raymond v. Fast Bail Bond et al
as 1:2012cv00535
Plaintiff:
Thomas J. Raymond
Defendant:
Fast Bail Bond, Marcus McGriff, T & H Bonds and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Tate, Jr. v. Secretary DOC, et al
as 11-11451
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES L. TATE, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, T. H. CANNON, Warden, D. MCCARTER, Captain and others
Riess v. Davis et al
as 2:2011cv00523
Plaintiff:
Richard Steven Riess
Defendant:
Cary Davis, Todd Mohn, Jesus Ruiz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Tate v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 8:2011cv00261
Plaintiff:
James L. Tate, Jr.
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, T. H. Cannon, D. McCarter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tate v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2011cv00105
Plaintiff:
James L. Tate, Jr.
Defendant:
Secretary, Department of Corrections, T. H. Cannon, D. McCarter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Tate, Jr. v. Secretary Department of Correc, et al
as 11-10042
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES L. TATE, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, T. H. CANNON and D. MCCARTER
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
