Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Israel Maldonado Ramirez v. Motion producer
as 2:2022cv01588
Plaintiff:
Israel Maldonado Ramirez
Defendant:
Motion producer and Producer Universal Studios
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cochran v. Producer & Manager of "Pop Smoke"
as 1:2021cv07470
Plaintiff:
Joseph Melvin Cochran
Defendant:
Producer & Manager of Pop Smoke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv05228
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651
GARRETT et al v. BURGLORD et al
as 5:2017cv00251
Plaintiff:
JOHNNIE GARRETT, MELVIN GARRETT and MCCLAIN
Defendant:
RELLZ BURGLORD, DISNEY, CBS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freeman et al v. Producers, Writers of the T.V. Show Law and Order
as 1:2015cv08549
Plaintiff:
Neapoleon Jwan Freeman, Sr. and Joy Lette Freeman
Defendant:
Producers, Writers of the T.V. Show Law and Order
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeter v. Beyonce et al
as 1:2015cv07076
Plaintiff:
Sharon Jeter
Defendant:
Beyonce, Obsessed Movie/Producers etc. and Rick Ross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mendez v. Idaho Falls Police Department et al
as 4:2013cv00036
Defendant:
Idaho Falls Police Department, Bonneville County Courthouse, Bonneville County Sheriff and others
Plaintiff:
Ivan Mendez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McDonald v. Peddler's Son Produce et al
as 2:2012cv02345
Plaintiff:
Roland Dewayne McDonald
Defendant:
Peddler's Son Produce, Ted Palmisano, Carolenyn McHome and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDonald v. Muraki et al
as 2:2012cv01943
Plaintiff:
Roland Dewayne McDonald
Defendant:
Kimo Muraki, Carolenyn McHome, Ted Palmisano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RAZTRADING LLC. v. US DEPT OF AGRICULTURE et al
as 1:2012cv00979
Plaintiff:
RAZTRADING LLC.
Defendant:
US DEPT OF AGRICULTURE, HUNTS POINT MKT. CO-OP., NEXIS LEXIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
