Cases 1 - 10 of 110
US v. Thomas Brown
as 24-6066
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
THOMAS MONTRIL BROWN, a/k/a Sparks
Brown v. Joe et al
as 1:2023cv02618
Petitioner:
Thomas Matthew Brown
Respondent:
President Biden Joe and First lady K. H.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Brown v. Levett
as 1:2023cv02466
Petitioner:
Thomas M. Brown
Respondent:
Eric Levett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Richardson v. Blinken et al
as 1:2023cv01909
Petitioner:
Stevevanus Richardson
Respondent:
Anthony Blinken, Merrick Garland, Thomas E. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Habeas Corpus:INS
Ottley v. Blinken et al
as 1:2023cv01918
Petitioner:
Dante Jevon Ericson Ottley
Respondent:
Anthony Blinken, Merrick Garland, Thomas E. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Habeas Corpus:INS
Henry Gofan, Jr. v. Darlene Pereksta, et al
as 22-3313
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HENRY SAYE GOFAN, JR.
Defendant:
DARLENE J. PEREKSTA, THOMAS M. BROWN, EDWARD BELMOUNT and others
Defendant / Appellee:
STEVEN ELMER, KEVIN B. STARKEY, JOHN A. TONELLI and others
Brown v. USA
as 4:2022cv02433
Petitioner:
Thomas Montril Brown
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Autrey v. 3M et al
as 2:2022cv00112
Plaintiff:
Justin Daniel Autrey
Defendant:
3M, Fairchild Air Force Base, Tyco Fire Products and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chavez v. 3M et al
as 2:2022cv00094
Plaintiff:
Joshua M Chavez
Defendant:
3M, Tyco Fire Products, Fair Child Airforce Base and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilkins v. 3M et al
as 2:2022cv00095
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Wilkins
Defendant:
3M, Fair Child Airforce Base, Tyco Fire Products and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
