Cases 1 - 10 of 983
Thornton v. Wellpath et al
as 0:2024cv00053
Plaintiff:
Michael Thornton
Defendant:
Wellpath, W. Whitney, Srinath Kamineni and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Schneider v. Scruggs et al
as 1:2024cv01324
Plaintiff:
Elliott R. Schneider
Defendant:
Carolyn J. Scruggs, J. Phillip Morgan, William Bohrer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Adam Titus v. Officer Thornton, et al
as 24-1714
Plaintiff:
ADAM TITUS
Defendant:
OFFICER THORNTON, Placement Officer, JOHN/JANE DOE, Maintenance Supervisor, WARDEN GOMEZ and others
Thornton v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv00902
Petitioner:
Shedrick Thornton
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Charles Thornton v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc., et al
as 24-1538
Plaintiff:
CHARLES E. THORNTON
Defendant:
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC., MARY JO ZIMMER, Nurse Practitioner, HCU at Menard CC and MOHAMMED SIDDIQUI
Donald Cokely v. Lucretia Battles Smith, et al
as 24-10738
Plaintiff:
DONALD CHADWICK COKELY
Defendant:
LUCRETIA BATTLES SMITH, DRAKE THORNTON and STEDMAN SCOTT
Williams et al v. Aramark et al
as 2:2024cv02146
Plaintiff:
Robert E. Williams, Corey D. Lurry and Jamal Moore
Defendant:
Aramark, Shelby County Sheriff Office, Floyd Bonner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Georgette Thornton v. Smokes, et al
as 24-10559
Plaintiff:
GEORGETTE BENITA THORNTON
Defendant:
SMOKES, PULASKI SP WARDEN, COMMISSIONER, GEORGIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Thornton v. Clinton et al
as 3:2024cv00446
Plaintiff:
Shedrick Thornton
Defendant:
Tina Y Clinton, Joni White, Timothy Fitzpatrick and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thornton v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2024cv00234
Plaintiff:
Charles E Thornton
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, Anthony Wills, Wexford Health Sources, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
