Cases 1 - 10 of 46
Curtis Brown, Sr. v. Court of Appeals
as 22-6135
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CURTIS JEROME BROWN, SR.
Defendant / Appellee:
COURT OF APPEALS, JUDGE DAVID C. NORTON, U.S. DISTRICT COURT and others
Clark et al v. The State of Georgia et al
as 1:2021cv04461
Plaintiff:
Robert L. Clark, Leroy Rogers, DeAngelo Cook and others
Defendant:
The State of Georgia, Sutton Richardson, Stephen Garner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Warth v. U. S. District Court Clerk's Office Cash Register et al
as 1:2020cv04059
Respondent:
U. S. District Court Clerk's Office Cash Register and Atlanta Federal Reserve Bank, Trustees
Petitioner:
David Warth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Gil-Mavarez v. Witte et al
as 6:2020cv00333
Defendant:
Indalecio Ramos, Diane Witte and U S District Court WD/LA
Plaintiff:
Francis Gil-Mavarez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02695
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01293
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Demouchette v. USA et al
as 5:2019cv00110
Plaintiff:
Preston G Demouchette, Jr and **Sanctioned/Barred* Preston G Demouchette, Jr
Defendant:
U S District Court WD/LA and USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2017cv00933
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Frederick Banks v. Dr. Allissa Marquez, et al
as 17-6387
Petitioner - Appellant:
FREDERICK HAMILTON BANKS
Respondent - Appellee:
DR. ALLISSA MARQUEZ, DR. LOGAN GRADDY, DR. CAHILL and others
COBBLE v. NEELEY et al
as 1:2016cv00235
Petitioner:
DANIEL ERIC COBBLE
Respondent:
ROBERT R NEELEY, ROBERT W CHASTEEN, JR, JENNIFER WARREN PHILLIPS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
