Cases 1 - 10 of 836
Baldomor v. Wilkins et al
as 2:2024cv00499
Plaintiff:
Christopher Baldomor
Defendant:
FNU Wilkins, GCCF and Alisha Tafoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ortiz v. Tafoya et al
as 1:2024cv00458
Plaintiff:
George Ortiz
Defendant:
Alisha Tafoya, New Mexico State Parole Board, FNU Wilkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strew v. Tafoya et al
as 1:2024cv00451
Plaintiff:
Daniel Strew
Defendant:
Alisha Tafoya, FNU Wilkins and Jacob LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keys v. Wilkins
as 24-60218
Petitioner:
Joseph Benjamin Keys
Respondent:
James Wilkins, Warden, Mississippi Department of Corrections
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv80585
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Maldonado v. Wilkins et al
as 1:2024cv00435
Plaintiff:
George Maldonado
Defendant:
FNU Wilkins, Jacob LNU and Alisha Tafoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Wright v. Granville County
as 24-1389
Plaintiff:
JOHN H. WRIGHT, Administrator of the Estate of Chad E. Price
Defendant:
GRANVILLE COUNTY, SHERIFF BRINDELL B. WILKINS, JR., CHARLES ROYSTER NOBLIN, JR. and others
Thomas v. Pate et al
as 5:2024ct03099
Plaintiff:
Daniel Isaiah Thomas
Defendant:
Lt. Pate, Robeson County, Burnis Wilkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilkins v. Clifford, et al.
as 2:2024cv00792
Petitioner:
Robert Wilkins
Respondent:
Ada County Sheriff Matthew Clifford, Attorney General Raul R. Labrador and Steve Wolfson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
William Chiles v. Domanick Smith
as 24-6354
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM BRANDON CHILES
Defendant:
DOMANICK D. SMITH, Assistant Unit Manager, CROMER HAIGLER, MACEO WILKINS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
