Cases 1 - 10 of 1,004
Aguilar v. Hall
as 4:2024cv03540
Respondent:
Tanisha Hall
Petitioner:
Raquel Aguilar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
White v. Ford et al
as 2:2024cv01523
Defendant:
Calvin Johnson, Julie Williams, Charles Daniels and others
Plaintiff:
Toney A. White
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Omler et al
as 2:2024cv01531
Defendant:
T. McCabe, James Wood, Barrios and others
Plaintiff:
Clyde Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mendez v. Alvarez et al
as 5:2024cv00924
Defendant:
Grievance Officer K. Morgan, Supervisor Ms. I. Figueroa, SERT Team and others
Plaintiff:
Eberto A. Mendez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Aguilar et al
as 5:2024cv00119
Defendant:
J. Villasana, Rosalinda Trevino and F. Aguilar
Plaintiff:
Kwhun Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SANDERS et al v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2024cv01296
Plaintiff:
JASON HERSHBERGER, ERIC HORTON, TRAVIS WHITE and others
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Aguilar v. Johnson County
as 3:2024cv01870
Plaintiff:
Vanesa Aguilar
Defendant:
Johnson County
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vizcarra-Aguilar v. Garrett
as 2:2024cv00127
Defendant:
C Garrett
Plaintiff:
Ernesto Vizcarra-Aguilar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Aguilar v. Bohinski, ET AL.
as 3:2024cv01011
Respondent:
JASEN BOHINSKI and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Petitioner:
JORGE AGUILAR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 State Petn for Writ of Habeas Corpus (IMMIGRATION)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00541
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
